New Post
Search
Help
ArchivesRe: Brignardello
in reply to a message by GETB
It is actually the most agreed upon hypothesis (see here: https://www.cognomix.it/origine-cognome/brignardello.php).
As for how it developed, it would be through:
1) metathesis of the initial 'r' (moving from before the 'n' to after the 'b');
2) dissimilation of the initial 'e' to 'i' (note that 'e' and 'i' are very close in articulation);
3) palatalisation of the 'n' ('gn' in Italian is pronounced like 'ny' in "canyon").
These are all common sound changes that occurred during the development of the southern Romance languages (Italian, Ligurian, etc.) so I personally find this hypothesis very likely. Sorry for being rather light on the details in the original post.
As for how it developed, it would be through:
1) metathesis of the initial 'r' (moving from before the 'n' to after the 'b');
2) dissimilation of the initial 'e' to 'i' (note that 'e' and 'i' are very close in articulation);
3) palatalisation of the 'n' ('gn' in Italian is pronounced like 'ny' in "canyon").
These are all common sound changes that occurred during the development of the southern Romance languages (Italian, Ligurian, etc.) so I personally find this hypothesis very likely. Sorry for being rather light on the details in the original post.
2
Replies
Thanks, yeah, I know it seemed I was nitpicking, but without your explanation i couldn't see such changes, to be frank, I also find little resemblance between Ulysses and Odysseus.
1